Theories on landscape practice, to be explored

(1) the landscape field is small and its literature inadequate. therefore, a singular, articulate practitioner can have a truly large impact on the trajectory of the profession (see notes on Corner, Smithson, Olmsted from earlier posts).

(2) landscape's potentials have yet to be well-presented to a wider audience. HOW - and in what language (technical, political, professional or otherwise) - the sharing of landscape themes takes place is a critical, lingering question.